overlooked if the reviewer becomes distracted by typos, poor grammar, or other errors in construction. Clear, concise language is key to a good proposal. Sample Comments: Proposal is poorly written (confusing, not logical, poorly organized, typos, etc.) Lack of detail Lack of a thorough thought process and clear story; lack of focus Give evaluations and comments on each of the publication criteria by following the sections of the reviewer report form. – Finally, provide an overall recommendation for or against publication. Use the “Reviewer’s remarks to the authors” section for providing comments and File Size: 28KB Here is a point-by-point response to the reviewers’ comments and concerns. Comments from Reviewer 1 [How to respond to comments that you agree with] Comment 1: [Paste the full comment here and italicize it.] Response: [Type your response here.] Thank you for pointing this out. I/We agree with this comment
Giving an effective peer review: sample framework and comments
When you write a peer review for a manuscript, what should you include in your comments? What should you leave out? And how should the review be formatted? This will also help you keep your comments organized. Think about structuring your review like an inverted pyramid. Put the most important information at the top, followed by details and examples in the center, and any additional points at the very bottom.
In your own words, summarize what the manuscript claims to report. This shows the editor how you interpreted the manuscript and will highlight any major differences in perspective between you and the other reviewers. End this section with your recommended course of action. Within each section, you can talk about the biggest issues first or go systematically figure-by-figure or claim-by-claim, reviewer comments to author sample.
Number each item so that your points are easy to follow this will also make it easier for the authors to respond to each point. Major issues should consist of the essential points the authors need to address before the manuscript can proceed.
Make sure you focus on what is fundamental for the current study. Minor issues are still important but typically will not affect the reviewer comments to author sample conclusions of the manuscript.
Some journals have a space for reviewers to enter confidential comments about the manuscript. Any serious issues should be raised directly and immediately with the journal as well, reviewer comments to author sample. Do not use this space to critique the manuscript, since comments entered here will not be passed along to the authors. If you are reviewing for a journal that does not offer a space for confidential comments, consider writing to the editorial office directly with your concerns.
Giving feedback is hard. Giving effective feedback can be even more challenging. Remember that your ultimate goal is to discuss what the authors would need to do in order to qualify for publication, reviewer comments to author sample.
The point is not to nitpick every piece of the manuscript. Your focus should be on providing constructive and critical feedback that the authors can use to improve reviewer comments to author sample study. Even if you decide not to identify yourself in the review, you should write comments that you would be comfortable signing your name reviewer comments to author sample. Keeping in mind the guidelines above, how do you put your thoughts into words? The authors should rewrite their Introduction and Discussion to reference the related literature, especially recently published work such as Darwin et al.
I could barely bring myself to finish it. I advise the authors work with a writing coach or copyeditor to improve the flow and readability of the text. This is a big mistake. Alternatively, the authors should include more information that clarifies and justifies their choice of methods. Here is some suggested language for common issues reviewer comments to author sample might experience.
What you think : The manuscript is fatally flawed. What you think: The writing is terrible. What you think : The authors have over-interpreted the findings. Check out the peer review examples at F Research to see how other reviewers write up their reports and give constructive feedback to authors. Be sure you turn in your report on time. Need an extension? Tell the journal so that they know what to expect.
If you need a lot of extra time, the journal might need to contact other reviewers or notify the author about the delay. Major vs. Do Justify your recommendation with concrete evidence and specific examples.
Be specific so the authors know what they need to do to improve. Be thorough. This might be the only time you read the manuscript. Be professional and respectful. The authors will be reading these comments too. Remember to say what you liked about the manuscript! Use the review to promote your own research or hypotheses.
Focus on typos and grammar. If the manuscript needs significant editing for language and writing quality, just mention this in your comments. Submit your review without proofreading it and checking everything one more time. What does a good review look like? Getting started as a reviewer Responding to an invitation Reading a manuscript Writing a peer review.
How to respond to peer reviewer comments
, time: 3:00How to Respond to Reviewer Comments
· Here we have placed the example real time response to the reviewers comments. Each reviewer has been responded politely and thoroughly with detailed answers. while answering the comments you have to be very polite and professional and mention all the references needed in the response comments to make it more understandable and clear to the editor and reviewers Sample Framework for Your Reviewer Comments Many journals provide reviewers with a form to fill out during review, but the framework below can be used in other cases. Describe the basic contribution of the paper. This should be a few sentences on the topic of the paper Here is a point-by-point response to the reviewers’ comments and concerns. Comments from Reviewer 1 [How to respond to comments that you agree with] Comment 1: [Paste the full comment here and italicize it.] Response: [Type your response here.] Thank you for pointing this out. I/We agree with this comment
No comments:
Post a Comment